What Is Individual Wireless Street Lighting Control

Individual wireless control is a communication architecture in which each luminaire is equipped with a radio or cellular communication module, enabling per-luminaire switching, dimming, diagnostics, and telemetry without relying on cabinet-based control.

Unlike segment control, which manages entire feeders, individual wireless control provides:

  • granular visibility,
  • per-node fault detection,
  • independent dimming levels,
  • flexible lighting profiles,
  • remote access to each lighting point.

Wireless control is typically implemented using sub-GHz RF (868/915 MHz) or cellular GSM/LTE IoT modules, depending on project conditions and urban density.

 

RF-Based Individual Control (Sub-GHz Radio Control)

In RF-based systems, each luminaire is equipped with a sub-GHz radio module, creating a wireless communication network between nodes and a central base station.

DITRA’s implementation of this approach uses a proprietary radio protocol known as LiWAVE, optimized specifically for outdoor lighting infrastructure.

How RF Control Works

  • Operates on license-free sub-GHz bands (868 or 915 MHz).
  • The central base station manages communication with all nodes within range.
  • Nodes support remote ON/OFF, dimming, and diagnostics.
  • The base station connects to the central software platform via GSM or Ethernet.

Technical Characteristics

  • Long-range sub-GHz propagation suitable for outdoor environments.
  • Resistance to building shadows and obstacles.
  • Lower latency than cellular communication.
  • Efficient for distributed lighting systems.

Recommended Use Cases

RF control is particularly suitable when:

  • luminaires are powered from decentralized sources,
  • the environment has low high-rise building density,
  • typical scenarios include intercity roads, bridges, suburban areas, or coastal zones.

 

GSM-Based Individual Control (Cellular IoT Control)

In GSM-based systems, each luminaire has a GSM/LTE IoT module and a dedicated SIM card, allowing direct communication with the central platform without the need for a base station.

How GSM Control Works

  • Each luminaire connects directly to the software platform through the cellular network.
  • Supports ON/OFF switching, dimming, diagnostics, and telemetry via the GSM/LTE backbone.
  • Ideal for distributed or dense urban environments.

Technical Characteristics

  • Independent communication channel for each luminaire.
  • Works in areas with complex or obstructed RF propagation paths.
  • No range limitations beyond the coverage of the mobile operator.
  • Suitable for large-scale or multi-cabinet deployments.

Recommended Use Cases

GSM control is typically preferred when:

  • luminaires are powered from decentralized electrical sources,
  • the installation area has high building density,
  • typical scenarios include central city districts, downtown zones, industrial campuses, or mixed-use urban areas.

 

RF vs GSM — Technical Comparison

RF vs GSM Technical Comparison

 

Advantages of Individual Wireless Control

  • Per-luminaire visibility and real-time diagnostics.
  • Independent dimming profiles.
  • Adaptive lighting support (motion, daylight sensors).
  • Scalable network topology.
  • Works with NEMA, Zhaga, and wire nodes.
  • Flexible deployment without cabinet infrastructure dependencies.
  • Enables mixed and hybrid architectures.

 

Limitations

  • Requires stable radio or cellular coverage.
  • GSM-based systems incur SIM/service costs.
  • RF performance may degrade in very dense urban areas.
  • Higher node count → more distributed maintenance.
  • Not ideal for long feeder lines with centralized supply (PLC/segment may be simpler).

 

When to Choose Individual Wireless Control

Choose wireless individual control when:

  • precise per-luminaire management is required,
  • luminaires are installed in decentralized locations,
  • environmental conditions limit RF propagation (use GSM),
  • RF conditions are favorable (use 868/915 MHz),
  • segment or PLC control is not feasible,
  • there is a need for maximum flexibility and intelligent sensor integration.